Intro to Communication Interpersonal Communication Honors Intro to Communication Argumentation and Debate Intro to Communication
On-Line
Honors Interpersonal Communication

Home
Instructor Information
Office Hours
Links

 

Self-Evaluation Assignment
SPT 241 HC

 Due Date: February 7 or 9, 2005

The purpose of analyzing you speech is so that you can gain a realistic view of your own strengths and weakness as a speaker.  While it may be difficult to be objective about ourselves, you should try to use an analytic approach.  Often we either focus only on the positives or are much harder on ourselves than others are.  This paper will not affect your grade on the speech itself.  It is to be used as a learning tool to benefit you.

A clear process may help in this assignment.
 

  1. First, view the tape solely for shock value.  Try not to look at anything specific.  This viewing is simply to get over the embarrassment or discomfort that often occurs watching ourselves on TV.
  2. Next, view the tape with the picture off.  Focus on what is being said.
  3. Finally, watch the video with the volume off, watching your body language.

 After viewing the tape, write a paper critiquing your presentation.  Include the following aspects:

  1. What did you do well?  What were your strong points including both verbal and nonverbal aspects.
  2. In what areas do you need improvement?  Be specific and explain why you feel this area needs work?
  3. How do you plan to improve?  In those areas in which you may be weak, what can/will you do to improve for the next speech?
     

Don’t attempt to critique every aspect of the presentation, focus on three or four elements using specifics from your presentation to support your ideas.  If you feel you weren’t well organized, why?  What leads you to that conclusion?

 Grading for the paper will be based on the following:  Were you able to identify the strengths and weaknesses?  Did you use specific examples from you speech to illustrate?  Did you offer specific suggestions for improvement?  Was the critique well-organized, errors in convention avoided?  Did you apply public speaking principles and concepts?

 Papers should be 1-2 pages in length, typed, 10-12 point font, black ink, 1-inch margins, proofread and stapled.

  

The following 16 generic questions are provided to assist you in your analysis.  Since they are a generic list, not all questions will apply to you specific situation.

 CONTENT
 

  1. Was the content suitable to the audience?
  2. Was the content appropriate to the purpose and time limitations?
  3. Were varied and interesting supporting materials used?

 ORGANIZATION

  1. Were main ideas clear?
  2. Were main points sufficiently developed?
  3. Were main points arranged in a recognizable pattern?
  4. Did the introduction successfully gain attention and set the context?
  5. Did transitions help provide the speech with unity and cohesion?
  6. Did the conclusion summarize and end the speech smoothly?

 DELIVERY

  1. Was eye contact maintained with the audience?
  2. Were facial expressions varied, supportive and interesting?
  3. Was the voice varied and supportive?
  4. Were gestures and movements varied and appropriate?
  5. Were visual aids clear and manageable?  Were they effectively presented?

 OVERALL ASSESSMENT

  1. What features of the speech will you want to use in future speeches?
  2. What features of the speech will you change?

 

 

  Adapted from:

Rust, Joseph.  The Principles of Effective Speaking: A Student Objective Handbook. 

            Harcourt-Brace: Orlando, 1993.


 

The views and opinions expressed in this page are strictly those of the creator.
The contents of this page have not been reviewed or approved by Columbia State Community College.  If you have questions or comments,
please contact lbenns@columbiastate.edu.

This page was last updated on August 26, 2008